It’s not the banks’ responsibility to compensate scam victims’ losses

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed below belong solely to the author.

Scams have been making the headlines quite frequently in recent months.

First, there was a phishing scam that targeted OCBC customers. Just a few months later, there was another one that targeted DBS customers instead. 

In general, scams are becoming more commonplace — 2021 saw a 24 per cent increase in reported cases as compared to 2020, and while rates for other crimes declined overall, the increase in scams was so significant that Singapore’s overall crime levels drove up.

Even celebrities have not been spared — Singaporean rapper Yung Raja lost almost S$100,000 to an NFT scam earlier this year.

The increasing number of affected Singaporeans, as well as the high-profile targets, have caused quite the outcry.

In response, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has announced that a framework for the equitable sharing of losses arising from scams is on the way.

In the meantime, the Association of Banks in Singapore has also put in place new guidelines in an attempt to try and reduce the amounts lost to scams. OCBC has even gone as far as to give customers access to a kill switch to freeze their accounts if they suspect that they have been scammed.

However, not everyone is satisfied. In particular, some have called for banks to bear all the losses from such scams, meaning that Singaporeans who fall victim to the scams should be compensated fully for the amount that they have lost.

Why should…

Read more…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *