IPCC. IPCC Special Report: Global Warming 1.5C (2019).
UNFCCC. Climate Action Pathway: Human Settlement (2020).
UNEP. 2021 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero-emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector (2021).
IEA. Energy Technology Perspectives 2020 (2020).
BuildingtoCOP26. Accelerating deep collaboration: 26 built environment climate action initiatives announced at COP26 (2021).
WGBC. The Net Zero Carbon Buildings Commitment (2021).
C40Cities. C40 Cities launch Clean Construction Coalition to halve emissions from global built environment sector by 2030 (2021).
Wang, X. & Lo, K. Just transition: a conceptual review. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 82, 102291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102291 (2021).
Sarah Burch. Accelerating a Just Transition to Smart, Sustainable Cities. Centre for Int. Gov. Innov. (2021).
SAPEA. A systemic approach to the energy transition. Science Advice for Policy by European Academieshttps://doi.org/10.26356/energytransition (2021).
USGov. Executive Order on Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad (2021).
WEForum. The Global Risk Report 2020 (2020).
UCS. A Transformative Climate Action Framework: Putting People at the Center of Our Nation’s Clean Energy Transition. (2021).
Devine-Wright, P. et al. Placing people at the heart of climate action. PLOS Climate 1, e0000035. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000035 (2022).
Christina Demski. Net zero public engagement and participation: a research note (2021).
Sovacool, B. K., Martiskainen, M., Hook, A. & Baker, L. Decarbonization and its discontents: a critical energy justice perspective on four low-carbon transitions. Clim. Change 155, 581–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02521-7 (2019).
Plank, C. et al. Climate policy integration viewed through the stakeholders’ eyes: a co-production of knowledge in social-ecological transformation research. Environ. Policy Gov. 31, 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1938 (2021).
Klinsky, S. & Mavrogianni, A. Climate justice and the built environment. Build. Cities 1, 412–428. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.65 (2020).
Axon, S. & Morrissey, J. Just energy transitions? Social inequities, vulnerabilities and unintended consequences. Build. Cities 1, 393–411. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.14 (2020).
Rizzoli, V., Norton, L. S. & Sarrica, M. Mapping the meanings of decarbonisation: a systematic review of studies in the social sciences using lexicometric analysis. Clean. Environ. Syst. 3, 100065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100065 (2021).
Grimmer, J. & Stewart, B. M. Text as data: the promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Polit. Anal. 21, 267–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mps028 (2013).
Debnath, R., Darby, S., Bardhan, R., Mohaddes, K. & Sunikka-Blank, M. Grounded reality meets machine learning: a deep-narrative analysis framework for energy policy research. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 69, 101704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101704 (2020).
Government, U. Using social media for social research: an introduction (2016).
Runge, J., Nowack, P., Kretschmer, M., Flaxman, S. & Sejdinovic, D. Detecting and quantifying causal associations in large nonlinear time series datasets. Sci. Adv.https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4996 (2019).
Anderson, A. A. Effects of social media use on climate change opinion, knowledge, and behavior. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Sciencehttps://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.369 (2017).
Berglez, P. & Al-Saqaf, W. Extreme weather and climate change: social media results, 2008–2017. Environ. Hazards 20, 382–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2020.1829532 (2020).
Anderson, A. G. Media, environment and the Network Society. 2634-6451 (Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2014), 1 edn.
Anderson, A. Media, politics and climate change: towards a new research agenda. Sociol. Compass 3, 166–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00188.x (2009).
Dixon, S. Number of social media users worldwide from 2018 to 2022, with forecasts from 2023 to 2027 (2022).
Howarth, C., Lane, M., Morse-Jones, S., Brooks, K. & Viner, D. The ‘co’ in co-production of climate action: challenging boundaries within and between science, policy and practice. Glob. Environ. Chang. 72, 102445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102445 (2022).
Hermida, A., Fletcher, F., Korell, D. & Logan, D. Share, like, recommend. J. Stud. 13, 815–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2012.664430 (2012).
Yeo, S. K., Xenos, M. A., Brossard, D. & Scheufele, D. A. Selecting our own science. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. 658, 172–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214557782 (2015).
Treen, K. M., Williams, H. T. & O’Neill, S. J. Online misinformation about climate change. WIREs Clim. Changehttps://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.665 (2020).
Cann, T. J., Weaver, I. S. & Williams, H. T. Ideological biases in social sharing of online information about climate change. PLoS Onehttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250656 (2021).
Cody, E. M., Reagan, A. J., Mitchell, L., Dodds, P. S. & Danforth, C. M. Climate change sentiment on twitter: an unsolicited public opinion poll. PLoS Onehttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136092 (2015).
Lineman, M., Do, Y., Kim, J. Y. & Joo, G.-J. Talking about climate change and global warming. PLoS Onehttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138996 (2015).
Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A. & Ladwig, P. The, “nasty effect:’’ online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 19, 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12009 (2013).
Anderson, A. A., Yeo, S. K., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A. & Xenos, M. A. Toxic talk: How online incivility can undermine perceptions of media. Int. J. Publ. Op. Res. 30, 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw022 (2016).
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J. & Medders, R. B. Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. J. Commun. 60, 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x (2010).
Kirilenko, A. P. & Stepchenkova, S. O. Public microblogging on climate change: one year of twitter worldwide. Glob. Environ. Chang. 26, 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.008 (2014).
Al-Saqaf, W. & Berglez, P. How do social media users link different types of extreme events to climate change? A study of twitter during 2008–2017. J. Extreme Events 06, 1950002. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2345737619500027 (2019).
Kirilenko, A. P., Molodtsova, T. & Stepchenkova, S. O. People as sensors: mass media and local temperature influence climate change discussion on twitter. Glob. Environ. Chang. 30, 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.11.003 (2015).
Yeo, S. K. et al. The influence of temperature on #climatechange and #globalwarming discourses on twitter. J. Sci. Commun.https://doi.org/10.22323/2.16050201 (2017).
A. Bruns & J.E. Burgess. The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. In Proceedings of 6th European Consortium for Political Research General Conference (Reykjavik, Iceland, 2011).
Wang, R., Liu, W. & Gao, S. Hashtags and information virality in networked social movement: examining hashtag co-occurrence patterns. Online Inf. Rev. 40, 850–866. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-12-2015-0378 (2016).
Howarth, C. & Painter, J. Exploring the science-policy interface on climate change: the role of the ipcc in informing local decision-making in the UK. Palgrave Commun.https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.58 (2016).
Orlove, B., Shwom, R., Markowitz, E. & Cheong, S.-M. Climate decision-making. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 45, 271–303. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-085130 (2020).
Perjo, L. Public-private-people partnerships – a new concept to bring public and private actors and citizens together (2016).
Wendel, C. Using shared value…
