Building booms create more ugly homes

No matter the season, we drive through neighborhoods and often see inexplicably hideous buildings. “How could they have done that?” mutters across our lips. Whether it is the blank boxes of apartments, or the unending tear-downs of history that are replaced by bloated homes, or just the hundredth brand new “Farmhouse” with a tiny “farm” of mowed grass, thousands of acts of disappointing structures explode in a building boom.

After forty years of helping to make buildings as an architect, I know that there are reasons for ugliness. Of course, you can blame the designer, or the builder, even the homeowners that can be relied upon to buy a home — any home, if the location is good, and the price tag is acceptable. But the numbers of those perpetrators of ugly explode during a housing boom.

Construction lives on a bizarre rollercoaster. Homebuilding projections approached 3,000,000 new units in 2006 and fell to 300,000 units per year in 2009. Today, the United States is at the end of its latest building boom. Less than a year ago the number of new home building starts was at a healthy 1,800,000 annual rate — not the frenzy of 2006, but fully 600% above its nadir a dozen years ago. Now the Census Bureau says we’re at the beginning of the next bust with housing starts slumping 8.1 percent to under 1,500,000 units in September.

No other economic sector has these rapid, reciprocal, manic booms followed by the deep depression of building busts. If the automobile industry or farming or electronics had a 90% rise or drop in sales every few years, job security would simply not exist.

Read more…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *