Opinion | The luna and terraUSD collapse shows what’s behind every cryptocurrency scheme

Placeholder while article actions load

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice — well, that’s exactly what keeps the cryptocurrency game going.

The collapse this month of digital tokens and exchanges featured a lot of names even laymen would recognize: bitcoin, Coinbase, ether. But the players perhaps most responsible for turning a slow decline into a plummet aren’t nearly as well known. The implosion of so-called stablecoin terraUSD and its sister coin luna show what all crypto schemes rely on: faith.

South Korean entrepreneur Do Kwon hawked terraUSD as an innovation that would transform the industry. Stablecoins are supposed to be exactly what their name implies: stable. They’re pegged to the value of an existing currency, usually the dollar, so that buyers can always exchange them at a 1-to-1 rate. Traditionally, their value is backed by a reserve including more reliable assets such as cash and treasuries — themselves backed by the full faith and credit of the United States.

Not so for terraUSD. TerraUSD is backed instead by … wait for it … an algorithm.

Kooky as this concept sounds, in the end it’s rooted less in complicated computer science than in good, old finance. TerraUSD was tied to a newly minted cryptocurrency (but not stablecoin) also controlled by the Terraform Labs company, called luna. To put things much too simply, the tokens’ creators linked terraUSD to luna in such a way that, when high-frequency traders eager to earn an easy buck sold…

Read more…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *